World Chess Championship 2013, round 3: a fighting game worth studying

In my continuing coverage of the World Chess Championship between Anand and Carlsen, today I cover round three, an exciting fighting game well worth studying.

Game and notes below:

Summary

If you were bored by the first round and the second round games, because the play in both games involved no major errors and therefore ended quickly in a draw, study this third round game, even though it too ended in a draw!

Carlsen opened with the unambitious Réti Opening yet again, and Anand was happy to repeat the Grünfeld Defense setup of round 1. Carlsen varied by a very quick c4 thrust against Anand’s d5 Pawn, but Anand played the most aggressive continuation, taking the Pawn, guaranteeing an asymmetrical Pawn structure and therefore a chance at fighting chess.

The ambitious Maróczy Bind

In fact, Anand aggressively adopted a reverse Dragon Sicilian Defense setup, with good long-term positional prospects as Black. Furthermore, he also quickly chose a plan to try to transform the position into a deadly reverse Maróczy Bind structure to squeeze Carlsen to death. Carlsen played inaccurately and in fact allowed Anand to adopt this structure.

If you are not familiar with the Maróczy Bind setup, check out a couple of my games in which I won using it, so you can see what can happen against weak defense:

Carlsen’s defense

Carlsen decided that instead of risking being squeezed to death, he would lash out and sacrifice a Pawn to get some open lines and possibly get chances against Anand’s King in order to simplify to a draw. I’m not sure whether it was sound, and Anand may have been able to play more challengingly to win (I have not done the intensive computer analysis to draw a conclusion), but in the end Anand wound up allowing simplification and losing back the won Pawn with a dead drawn ending.

The state of the match: Carlsen under real pressure

This is now the third game in a row in which Anand acquired an advantage out of the opening. And in each game, his advantage in the game has only grown. This trend is not at all good for Carlsen. He has been completely neutralized as Anand has consistently gained superior space and piece play. Carlsen had to fight hard for a draw in this game. As White in two games now, he has been playing the opening poorly, which one does not need to be a world class player to see. Is this rope-a-dope or what?

But what about Anand? Why did he keep on taking the safe way out to a draw in three games when he could have avoided simplification each time in an attempt to win? If Anand plays cautiously when he has the advantage, what might happen if Carlsen starts playing differently and gets Anand’s back against the wall in a game?

The game

Move comment:
Event: FWCM 2013
Site: Chennai
Round: 3
Date: 2013.11.12
White: Carlsen, Magnus
Black: Anand, Viswanathan
Result: 1/2-1/2

Side to move: white

Last move: 1.  variations:
Next move: 1. Nf3  variations:

1. Nf3
 
The Reti again, as in round 1. I wonder how many more times Carlsen will try the Reti.
 
1... d5 2. g3 g6 3. c4
 
Finally, a more unbalanced continuation.
 
3... dc4
 
Ambitious, immediately creating an asymmetric Pawn structure. [3... c6 Anand could have continued in Slav style, in which case I'm not sure what Carlsen was planning. It is possible that eventually he was going to play the unbalancing d3 instead of the sterile d4 of the first round. 4. Bg2 Bg7 5. O-O Nf6 6. d3 O-O My prediction for how the game would have gone.]
 
4. Qa4
 
Deciding to ensure regaining the Pawn eventually with the Queen. [4. Bg2 Nc6 5. O-O Bg7 6. Qa4 e5 Would have transposed.] [4. Na3 Possible, but the Knight is not particularly well-placed at a3 or even c4.]
 
4... Nc6 5. Bg2 Bg7 6. Nc3 e5
 
Ambitious, transposing into a reversed Dragon.
 
7. Qc4
 
White has regained the Pawn, resulting in a reversed Dragon position, but at the cost of moving the Queen around. I would consider that White's opening has already failed. Black has even saved a tempo compared to analogous positions in which the Knight goes to d5 and then retreats back to e7. The position is one of dynamic equality, but nothing for White to be excited by. I would rather be Black.
 
7... Nge7 8. O-O O-O 9. d3 h6
 
$201
 
10. Bd2 Nd4!?
 
A surprise to me. I do not think this is good. This is thematic in some positions in this opening structure, but given that Black still has to complete development and has more space and therefore exchanges favor White, I would have waited. [10... Be6 Perfectly natural and what I would have played, continuing development.]
 
11. Nd4
 
White cannot afford to leave Black's Knight on its powerful outpost.
 
11... ed4 12. Ne4
 
Black now may have a thorn in White's center, but the half-open c file is somewhat loose, and the c5 square still belongs to White. White has a good Knight on e4 and White's Bishop on g2 has also been unleashed by this trade.
 
12... c6
 
Blocking up the a8 to h1 diagonal against White's light-squared Bishop. [12... Be6? Looks natural, developing the Bishop, but now it is a losing move, because of White's double threats against h6 and b7. 13. Qc1 Wins.]
 
13. Bb4
 
Immediately aiming at Black's weak dark squares and temporarily pinning Black's Knight.
 
13... Be6 14. Qc1
 
White cannot be happy about having moved the Queen three times just to reach this square.
 
14... Bd5
 
$201 To neutralize White's light-squared Bishop and pre-empt a White Nc5. White's position is rather unpromising. Black is the one with a grip on the center and a clear plan to expand on the Queen side with the b and c Pawns.
 
15. a4
 
White badly needs counterplay on the Queen side before Black takes it over himself.
 
15... b6
 
Planning to play c5 reaching a Maroczy Bind Pawn structure and shutting out White's dark-squared Bishop. [15... a5 Immediately killing White's Queen side counterplay was possible. It does loosen up some Queen side squares, especially if Black continues with a Maroczy b6, c5 plan, but in these types of positions it can be worthwhile to squash White's a5 ideas that leads to White counterplay on the a file. The main drawback is that weakening b5 means that the plan of b5, c5, c4 then becomes impossible because of lack of connected Pawn support on b5. On the other hand, locking up the Queen side for good can sometimes allow Black to advance on the King side with f5 and so forth. Anand must have decided that preserving the b5, c5, c4 plan was best.]
 
16. Be7
 
Getting rid of the Bishop before it gets shut out.
 
16... Qe7 17. a5 Rab8
 
Ceding the a file to White, but preventing simplification. Black wants to use the other Rook to support the thematic Pawn advances on the Queen side.
 
18. Re1
 
The e2 Pawn needed to be protected in case the Knight on e4 is driven away. Also, White wants to prepare for a thematic e3 eventually to challenge Black's center.
 
18... Rfc8
 
[18... c5? Leaves the d5 Bishop unprotected to a tactic. 19. ab6 ab6 20. Nf6]
 
19. ab6 ab6 20. Qf4 Rd8
 
Preventing an invasion on d6 while protecting d5.
 
21. h4
 
Preventing g5 by Black, which would drive White back for good and establish a bind on the King side while preparing the Queen side attack.
 
21... Kh7
 
Protecting the h6 Pawn to free up the Bishop on g7 to go to e5 to drive Black's Queen back.
 
22. Nd2
 
Trying to simplify but at a cost.
 
22... Be5 23. Qg4 h5
 
A committal choice, ceding the g5 square to White's Knight, but with the point of driving White back.
 
24. Qh3 Be6 25. Qh1
 
Wow, what a place for White's most powerful piece!
 
25... c5
 
$201 Maroczy Bind Pawn structure achieved. Now Black's plan is obvious: push b5, c4, aim to create a passed Pawn on c3. White's position is looking bad. All he has to go on is Black's weak g5 square, the White diagonal control, and a possible break on the e file. Is this enough for counterplay for a draw?
 
26. Ne4 Kg7 27. Ng5
 
Aiming to eventually simplify further, removing Black's Bishop pair advantage and reaching a position with opposite-colored Bishops.
 
27... b5
 
c4 is coming.
 
28. e3!?
 
White goes wild, trying to neutralize Black's plan to create connected passed Pawns, even at the cost of losing a Pawn. The alternative was to wait and possibly get squeezed to death. It's a question of whether it was possible to wait patiently and defend. Carlsen clearly felt uncomfortable with that prospect.
 
28... de3 29. Re3 Bd4
 
[29... Bb2 Why did Anand not just take the Pawn? Let's look at what happens with White counterplay on e6. 30. Rae1 Rb6 31. Bd5 Bd4 32. Re6 (32. R3e2? Qf6 Black gets out of the pin successfully, keeps the extra Pawn, and wins.) 32... fe6 33. Re6 Qf8 White is an exchange down. Can he hold the draw? I don't know. Apparently Anand did not know either.]
 
30. Re2 c4 31. Ne6 fe6
 
$201
 
32. Be4
 
Trying to activate the Bishop, and then the Queen from h1. [32. dc4 Opens the b file for Black against the b2 Pawn. 32... bc4 Maybe White can hold, but it does not look fun.]
 
32... cd3 33. Rd2
 
[33. Bd3? Opening the way for Black's Rook while also losing a Pawn is terrible. 33... Bf2 34. Rf2 Rd3]
 
33... Qb4?!
 
Going for the b2 Pawn. At this point, with so many possible open lines, I no longer trusted my judgment and finally used the computer for analysis. Computer thinks Black's advantage is no longer so great, presumably because Black's King is exposed. [33... Rf8 Computer went for White's f2 Pawn. Still not clearly a win.]
 
34. Rad1 Bb2
 
$201 And Black has won a Pawn.
 
35. Qf3
 
Finally reactivating the Queen. White will regain one of the two lost Pawns, by taking on d3, then try to get a Rook to d7 against Black's exposed King.
 
35... Bf6 36. Rd3 Rd3 37. Rd3 Rd8?
 
Conceding simplification and a draw. [37... Bd4 Creating a dark-squared outpost and blockade ( follow up with e5 ) would have retained at least some winning chances.]
 
38. Rd8 Bd8
 
$201
 
39. Bd3
 
Threatening Qb7+ to regain the Pawn on b5. The game is now clearly a draw. Anand must been disappointed to see that.
 
39... Qd4 40. Bb5 Qf6 41. Qb7 Be7 42. Kg2 g5 43. hg5 Qg5 44. Bc4 h4 45. Qc7 hg3 46. Qg3 e5 47. Kf3 Qg3 48. fg3 Bc5 49. Ke4 Bd4 50. Kf5 Bf2 51. Ke5 Bg3