Pittsburgh Chess Club Championship 2013, Round 2: surviving time trouble
Jan 23, 2013 · 6 minute read · CommentschessPittsburghPittsburgh Chess ClubpsychologySicilian Defense
Round 2 of the annual Pittsburgh Chess Club Championship had me playing a tough and very long game, the second to last game to finish (which it did after four hours). There was time trouble for both me and my opponent near the end of the game, but I managed to win.
So I thought I would touch on the issue of time trouble in chess.
My complete annotated game
At your convenience, you can enjoy playing over the game with my annotations, including diagrams.
Preparation
As mentioned in my report on round 1, after which I knew who my opponent was supposed to be for round 2, Melih Ozbek, I had nothing to prepare for this round. I had only played him once before, as White, not as Black.
Overview of my game
The opening
It turned out that Melih plays the Grand Prix Attack against the Sicilian Defense, which was featured in one of my games in a previous tournament. We arrived at a thematic position in which I felt happy on the Black side:
The middlegame
Eventually we reached an important position in which I managed to get in f5
, permanently blocking White from that thematic square:
After White took on f5
, we reached a position in which Black arguably is the one with the attacking chances on the King side, having the half open g
file and pressure against White’s Pawn on g2
. Objectively, White can hold, but Black is the one with the attack:
Melih invited me into complications by giving up the b2
Pawn in exchange for the c5
Pawn. I was happy to oblige, and we reached an interesting position in which White fought for counterplay on the Queen side and center:
After some inaccuracies by White, we reached a position clearly favorable to Black:
The clock is ticking for both of us
I thought for a long time but could not find a win (and there isn’t one). I then realized I had to play something, and that clearly I was getting tired because I could not think as well as I could hours earlier at the beginning of the game.
I could not afford to get into time trouble later in the game when I expected more important positions to potentially arise. I started playing “safely”, with the idea of waiting for my opponent to make worse moves than mine.
Missing a win
We reached this position, in which there was a beautiful forced win that I completely missed. If I had found it, I would be submitting my game for the “Best Attack” special prize for the tournament!
The winning move is Ra2!!
sacrificing a Rook to deflect White from King defense. If White takes the Rook, then Black invades with Qg3
.
More misses
There are more sacrificial wins I also missed later. For example, this sacrifice on g2
enables Black to win by getting down to the back rank with the Rook and Queen:
Anyway, we reached another critical position where there was a clear win for Black. I saw it but time was running low, I was getting confused, and I didn’t play it (Bh4
and then Bg3+
), instead playing e5
:
It turns out that White could have simply played Nf3
and held everything, but he didn’t, and so the position was critical yet again. This time, I played Bh4
, of course.
But then I inexplicably chose not to play the winning Bg3+
. All I can say is that in time trouble sometimes things get confused in my brain.
I played exf4
instead, which is so bizarre, because it allows White onto the diagonal straight to the King, that I don’t know what I was thinking! (Note that by this time neither players were keeping score, because of the time trouble.)
Finally, I played the winning move Rxh3+!
, except that I didn’t see the whole winning followup so I get no credit for this move:
Here, I faltered completely, failing to do the zigzag checking dance with the Queen to pick up White’s Knight at c2
with check before proceeding further:
Instead, we entered an endgame that, sadly for Black, is actually quite tenable for White.
The endgame
However, because I had been so obsessed with playing quickly in time trouble, I was ahead on the clock, and my opponent barely had any time to think at all, and in a position like this, the Queen can be very dangerous because of checking possibilities and tactics that might pick up a stray piece. And that’s what happened, as my opponent played blunder after blunder. He hung not only his Rook, but eventually his Knight as well.
With hardly any time on the clock left, Melih touched his King reflexively in this position, saw that his Knight was hanging, and resigned.
Lessons learned from my game
- Having a time advantage near the end was helpful.
- In time trouble, if you don’t see the win, at least don’t blunder into a loss.
- When short of time, it is advantageous to have the attack and to have active, obviously used weapons such as a Queen and passed Pawns.
- Anything can happen in time trouble, so setting easy tactical traps (such as forking pieces) is a valid strategy.
- Remember that most human chess games are really lost, not won; many positions that look bad are, to computers, completely defensible. But in practice, some positions are harder to defend by humans (especially under time pressure) than others.
A note on my time trouble issues: these days I have not been playing very well under time trouble, but I remember a period when I was actually pretty good at playing with little time, and won the 2006 Pennsylvania State Game/29 Championship as well as the 2006 Pennsylvania Action Chess Championship with perfect scores.
So I think dealing with time constraints is totally a matter of regular practice and training. I used to play 5-minute blitz a lot, and that helped me make practical decisions reflexively with little time. I am too busy these days to hang out at the club and play blitz, so my overall chess competitiveness has suffered as a result.
What next?
Next week for round 3, I get White again against John Ahlborg, whom I played for the first time also as White a couple of months ago. Now that he knows how I play, I expect he will be prepared against me in some fashion. No worries, I am probably not going to repeat any ideas I’ve posted so far on this blog!
Conclusion
I had a tough game in which although I may have had a small advantage during much of it, I did not actually have a won position until near the end, but at that point, time pressure marred both my play and my opponent’s. Finally, as the pieces went flying on the board, he erred worse than I did, and I won.